PUBLISHED ON
I was recently covering the importance of building your very own marketing technology ecosystem, fitting in it a varied collection of software solutions that every one of us should be able to align with his or her own vision and marketing strategy.
I have also mentioned a few alternative frameworks, and I believe we can take this a bit further by putting together our own “zoomed-in” perspective of a company’s “marketing information” needs.
The schema below borrows concepts from Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms 2014 (where a good distinction has been established between three broad categories: information delivery, analysis and integration), Chief Marketing Technologist’s Marketing Technology Landscape 2014 (drawing a clear line between “business intelligence”, analytics platforms focused on “digital” data, and dashboards) and Gartner’s Who’s Who in Interactive Visualization for Analysis and Dashboarding 2011.
We have also fitted every single piece of software we have come across over the course of the past few months in one or more of the following three circles, themselves representing:
These broad criteria run parallel to the four stages affecting marketing data nowadays: Integration, discovery, delivery and (where existing) insight management. The higher up we go in this scale, the stronger the focus on people rather than data.
Of course, there is room for many a sweet spot in the confluence of these circles:
Needless to say, it remains the marketers’ task to ascertain which combination of products best serves his or her needs.
It is not hard to imagine that most players in a given industry will be likely to favor a similar approach as a result of one type of data being predominant over another (think of transactional data in banking vs. unstructured, social media-rich data in the management of consumer brands), or the existence of differing levels of stakeholders as a result of a given company culture (think of a stronger focus on data delivery in more data-driven cultures that promote the democratization of business metrics).
Gartner’s own summary is perhaps the best starting point if we are to draw any conclusions: “governed data discovery” – the ability to meet the dual demands of enterprise IT and business users – remains a challenge unmet by any one vendor. Not surprising. It seems clear from our perspective that data discovery will not serve business users while it remains a time-consuming task with a steep learning curve (no matter how user friendly).
An interesting point is also raised (in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant) on the subject of “Scorecards” and performance management: Most companies do not implement true scorecard/strategy maps using BI platforms – they implement dashboards. They are hence relegated to the Corporate Performance Management (“CPM”) arena.
Is there, however, more distance between performance scorecards and dashboards than there is between dashboards and raw data integration? After all, “technical” and “human” factors are already coexisting under a single roof.
But perhaps the most evident trend, in these reports and beyond, is the fact that every single process is becoming simplified once again by a new generation of tools that the market struggles to categorize or easily label, but that early adopters are already leveraging to obtain serious competitive advantages.
All in all widely open for discussion. And it is a very interesting one.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
NOTE TO VENDORS INCLUDED HERE: Please feel free to submit your request for removal/change in the position of your own logo should you believe it does not accurately reflect your strengths.
Not Another Dashboard.
Add a comment